Snowball sampling is when you choose one participant and ask them to ask their friends to take part too. This can be used when you're researching a group that's quite hard to get
access to, for example, criminals.
Monday, 7 March 2016
30 Marker Practice
As
an A Level student, you have been asked to design a research project
to collect qualitative data on the way of life of young homeless
people in your area. (30 marks)
Before
beginning my research, I would do some secondary research into young
homeless people in the Poole and Bournemouth area. Due to people
under 18 often being able to go into social care or hostels, it is
difficult to find homeless people under the age of 18. Therefore my
research would class young people as those aged 18 to 25. My
secondary research would help me to gain a better understanding of
the topic which would benefit my project.
Operationalisation
is key, so I will operationalise 'way of life' by looking into the
norms, values, beliefs and daily routines of my participants. This
would be more valid because I would be gaining an in-depth look at
how young homeless people go about their daily lives. My participants
may also show the Hawthorne Effect, so this would have to be
considered and taken into account when my results are collected. The
results also may not be reliable due to issues with consistency, so I
would not be able to generalise my data. Each participant would be
different so representativeness would also be an issue. All of this
would be taken into account when looking at the results of my
project.
My
target population will be young homeless people in Poole and
Bournemouth. I won't be able to create a sampling frame, which is a
drawback of being an A Level student. Due to this, the best sampling
method would be Snowball sampling. This is when you find one
participant and ask them to ask people they know to be part of your
research. This way, you can find more people from the same sort of
population, in this case, homeless people. A drawback of this is that
my sample is likely not to be representative because all my
participants know each other, however due to this research being
qualitative, it is more important to gain in-depth research than
representative research.
I
would be using unstructured interviews to gain qualitative data. This
is when I have a rough ida of what my interview aims to find out, but
my questions aren't planned which allows me to ask questions relevant
to the information the participant gives me. This method is good
because it would allow me to get lots of information in a way that
allows the participant to be understood clearly and allows me to
collect relevant data. This method also means that my participants
are able to fully explain their way of life and their experiences,
and I’m able to fully understand them. However, a drawback of this
method is that it's unlikely any of my interviews will ave the same
sort of outcome, making it difficult to compare my results and to
categorise them. This makes the research less reliable and
inconsistent.
I
would carry out a pilot study in order to make sure my interviews are
easy to understand and to complete, and to make sure I am able to
collect relevant data for my aim. I would use opportunity sampling
due to being a student and having little money. I would ask a
homeless person a series of questions to check if they are easy to
understand and answer.
I
would need to consider ethical issues such as consent, privacy,
confidentiality and withdrawal. I would make sure all my participants
are happy to take part and also that they are aware of their options
when it comes to privacy and confidentiality. They would be given the
option to remain anonymous. I also need to consider sensitivity, due
to some areas of my research potentially being upsetting for my
participants. Therefore I would make sure all my questions are worded
in a way which stops them from being upsetting, and that my
participants are given the option to say that they don't want to
answer a question if they feel its too personal or invasive. Due to
the sensitivity of the research, the results may not be valid.
A
practical issue I may face is time. Due to my use of unstructured
interviews, my research is likely to be time consuming which means I
can spend less time interviewing extra participants. This will impact
the representativeness of my results. However, due to Bournemouth and
Poole being busy areas, there is a higher concentration of homeless
people, who may be willing to take part in my research. This will
save me time as I won't have to be looking for more participants.
Once
I have completed my research, I will look at my notes from each
interview in order to see any similarities or trends in the way of
life of my participants. This would be seen through their answers
regarding their norms, values, beliefs and routines.
My
research would be interpretivist, due to the fact that way of life
can't be measured. The fact that this data must be interpreted means
it will be more valid.
Positivists
would state that this research would be unreliable due to being
subjective and inconsistent. Also, because the sample would be small,
it lacks generalisability.
After
all of this, I would draw a conclusion from my research which would
outline the way of life of young homeless people in the Poole and
Bournemouth area.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)